Introduction to Jupyter at NHR@KIT

Survey

Participants Feedback

Please rate the workshop regarding the following aspects

How do you rate the lecture as a whole?

1

2

3

4

5

1 very bad, 5 very good

How is the lecture structured?

1

2

3

4

5

Please rate from 1 - very badly to 5 - very well

Knowledge gain

1

2

3

4

5

Please rate from 1 - very small to 5 - very high

Contents

1

2

3

4

5

Please rate from 1 - very limited to 5 - very high

Clarity

1

2

3

4

5

Please rate from 1 - very abstract to 5 - very clear

Speed

1

2

3

4

5

Please rate from 1 - too slow to 5 - too fast

Do you understand the importance of the course contents to your work?

1

2

3

4

5

Please rate from 1 - not at all to 5 - very clearly

Suitability of teaching und learning material (handouts)

1

2

3

4

5

Please rate from 1 - very inadequate to 5 - very adequate

General Commentaries

In particular, I liked:

In particular, I did not like:

Do you have any suggestions for improving the course?

Would you recommend this course to others

1

2

3

4

5

Please rate from 1 - not at all to 5 - very much

Do you have any suggestions for other course topics?

Organisation

Registration

1

2

3

4

5

Please rate from 1 - very bad to 5 - very good

Service

1

2

3

4

5

Please rate from 1 - very bad to 5 - very good

How were you informed about this course?

www

mailing list

colleagues

other

For our statistics, we need some more information

Affiliation (type):

student

PhD student

employee (but not PhD student)

Faculty

No selection

Economics and social science

Molecular life science

Computational chemistry

Neuroscience

Micro systems engineering

Elementary particle physics

Bioinformatics

Astrophysics

Earth System Sciences

Material Sciences

Others

Your answers will be submitted anonymously.